Wednesday, July 27, 2022

ProteoCool Pills#18: MabSelect@ a cheaper alternative to proteinA sepharose FF resin for small scale gravity flow purification of recombinant mab

Affinity chromatography which is based on the interaction the Fc region of the mAb molecule with  specifi bacterial proteins as proteinA, proteinG or protein L immobilized on the resin is generally used for the isolation of antibodies from culture surnantants of the cell lines (eg CHO) used for their recombinant production.

The binding specificity and strength of protein A, protein G and protein L is not equally strong for all immunoglobulins and, in the case of IgG, not equal for all isotypes (Link1, Link2)

A generally stronger binding to the Fc region is observed by protein G, however higher binding strength however does not automatically result in better results since also the presence of impurities may influence the binding capacity.

In both, protein A and protein G affinity chromatography, the elution is carried out using a low pH buffer (eg glicine pH 2,7 for proteinG, and citrate pH3,0 for protein A). Generally in protein G chromatography, a stronger eluent is required to elute the  captured antibody from the coloumn.

Thus, protein A chromatography is preferred over protein G since lower levels of impurities are generally obtained and it currently represent the gold standard in mAb pruficiation. 

In general an efficient protein A resin should have: 

- High dynamic binding capacity (able to bind large amounts of mAbs in a short time) which allow high flow-rate without losing mAbs in the flow-through

-  High stability of the resin under regeneration with sodium hydroxide. The number of cycles you can run with the same resin has a huge economic impact;

Often, in the preliminary phases of the pre-clinical research, to identify the best mabs, scientists have to a large panel of different mabs in small amount (from ug to mgs). In absence of robotic platforms dedicated to mab purification, the gravity flow purification may represent a simple and powerful alternative.   

Gravity flow purification require a resin with high porosity, rigidity and low backpressure to avoid resin clogging and guarantee reasonable flow-rate and purification timelines.

The Citivya rProteinA Fast flow resins  (90uM of particle diameter), which represent the gold standard for the gravity flow purification of recombinant monoclonal antibodies is very expensive  (more than 80euro/ml). 

If it is true that this resin could be cleaned and re-generated several time and that thanks to its high binding capability (>35mg/ml)  generally small volumes (100-500ul/sample) of resin are enough to purify mgs of mab samples requited in the preliminary mab screening phase i however its cost may have an high impact expecially in academic laboratories and the identification of an alternative resin with similar performances but low cost is preferable.

In this post i would like to share with you some enocuraging results that i have recently obtained with gravity flow purification by replacing the rprotA FF with the cheaper Mabselect resin which is reported to have 

- similar binding capability  (30mg/ml of Mabselect vs 35mg/ml of rproA FF)

and

- similar particle size  (85um of Mabselect vs 90um of rproA FF)

but it is at least 5 time cheaper (25ml of mabselect cost = 5ml of rprotA resin)


Mab Select resin tested in the 2 following  formats

format 1 (small)  --> 75ul of resin in a Poliprep coloum (Biorad cod. #731-550)

format2 (medium) --> 750ul of resin in a PD-10 empty coloumn  (GE cod. 17-0851-01)

showed flow rate very close to the FF (as you can see in the following videos: protA FF on the left, MAbselect on the right) 

Video 1: Equilibration with buffer


                                                 Video 2: Expi-CHO surnatant loading


and similar results in terms of binding capacity and final mab purity level

In the following picture, 2 examples of purification performed with the MabSelect resin

In both cases the following buffers were used: 


- Tris 2M pH=8 (1ml for 20ml culture) to correct the surnatant pH before coloumn loading;

- Equilibration and washing buffer; Tris 25mM, NaCl 25mM pH 7,2  buffer;

- Elution buffer: 300ul di Citrate 100mM NaCl 60mM pH=3;

- Tris 1M pH=9 (30ul for small size; 300ul for medium size) to neutralize the acid pH after elution


Of course there are many other interesting proteinA resins cheaper than the rProtA FF ND produded from suppliers different from Cytiva as  Tosoh. Biorad,  Thermo that could be also tested.

Personally, i selected the Mabselect since was the one with the particle size more close to the FF and i suspect that this detail can be essential to guarantee a good flow rare  in gravity flow purification. 

Friday, July 8, 2022

ProteoCool Pills#17: Alternative cheaper trasfection agents for recombinant protein/antibody expression with Expi293

 As already reported in the ProteoCool n° 29, Expi293 are a powerfull cell line those, thanks to their ability to growth up to very high cell density and be transfected with high efficiency are able to secrete in the surnatant high yields of recombinant proteins.

The main factor that currently limit the application of this system is certanilly the cost, since the volumetric cost (euro/liter of culture) is very high and comparable with the cost of a 13C/15N labelled sample in E.coli.

Cost of 30ml culture of Expi293 (updated to July 2022)

Components:

a) Expi293 expression medium (cod. A1435101 Thermo)  cost: 331euro (quotation 2022) --> 1 liter 

b) Expifectamine trasfection kit (cod. A14524 Thermo) cost:  1100 euro  (quotation 2022) --> For 1 liter

c) Cup vented Corning shaking flaks 125ml cod. 734-1885 (VWR quotation 2022) --> 8,8 euro/flask

d) DNA preparation  (EZNA mini kit II cod. D6945-02) 1 -> euro/1 sample – Thermo midi kit cod. K210004 cost 4euro/1sample)

Therefore the total cost of a 30ml tranfection 

 9,9(a)+ 33(b)+8,8(c)+1-4(d) = 50-55euro/flask  --> Around  1.800 euro/liter

and the tranfection reagent contribute to more than 50% of the costs (33 out of 55 euro)

Since the Expi293 become progressivelly more popular, several company develope alternative  tranfection agents that are suggested to be suitable for Expi 293.

In this post i briefly sgow you the results that i obtained by comparing;

- The standard Expifectamine 293 Transfection kit ;

- Endofectin Expi293 transfection kit;

- FectroPro transfection kit 

2 different expression trials in 2ml format (6 well plates)

Trial 1: 2 recombinant His-tagger protein; 
Trial2; 2 recombinant monoclonal antibodies)

 performed to compare the  producivity of the different trasferction agents;

In all cases the only reagents that are different are those part of the transfection kits
, while culture media (Expi293 culture media) and antibiotics, are the same 
alteady listed in ProteoCool n°29





Summary:

Those preliminary data suggest that both Endofectin Expi293 and Fectopro
 show performances close to the Expifectamin293  Thermo reagent with Expi293 cells

Of course the trails was performed with a limited number of protens and few replicates and more data need to be performed to confirm it, but it seems that the differences in protein/antibody productivity, if there are differences, are much less important than the difference in terms of costs.

The same comparision performed with the Expi-CHO kit was not successfull (data not shown) 
probably because the Endofectamine293 and Fectopro Kit do not contain any medium Feed
 which seems to be essential to allow the ExpiCHO cells to growth until high cell densities
  (trasfection with ExpiCHO is performed at 6*10^6 cells/ml vs 3*10^6 cells/ml used for the Expi293) and retain good viability during the entire trasfection(8 days).






usefull links #1

i would like with share the folliwng 3 links about usefull on line tool for the scientist working with recombinant monoclonal antibodies:   ...